Batman vs. Charles Dickens

Quora posted my answer to the Huffington Post! The nancyhua.com version below has a longer ending than the Huffington/Quora because I feel more free to ramble on my own site (perhaps you’re surprised to discover I show restraint when writing on other sites, or at all. Here’s a way for you to contrast the difference between me writing haphazardly and even more haphazardly). This answer is rife with spoilers of Dickens, Dark Knight, and the meaning of life, so if you don’t want to be initiated into the mysteries of the universe, resist the urge to read on:

What Do You Think of Christopher Nolan Using A Tale of Two Cities for Inspiration for the Script to The Dark Knight Rises?

I didn’t notice Nolan was using A Tale of Two Cities until the Act 5 (or 7?…) burial scene where Gordon quotes directly from it, “‘Tis a far, far better thing I do than I have ever done,” at which point the incongruous stuff such as the scenes of blue collar people tearing fur coats off trophy wives suddenly had an explanation. Those scenes otherwise make zero sense to me: how are the middle class citizens of Gotham suddenly villains staging executions and mock trials?

Anyway, after realizing Nolan was drawing from Dickens, upon closer examination the parallels are pretty tight, right down to the twist ending of A Tale of Two Cities where Madame Defarge turns out to be the daughter of that murdered family paralleling Nolan’s reveal of that billionaire lady turning out to be the daughter of Ra’s Al Ghul. I guess even though Nolan tries to beat you over the head with it, you can’t be heavy handed enough these days, especially with old stuff like Dickens.

Aside from the big reveal in both works turning out to be that the orphaned girl grows up to be the mastermind killer seeking to avenge her family through mass murder, other parallels include:
1. Secret backstory: Batman, billionaire woman, Catwoman vs. Dickens’ Darnay, the DeFarges, the prisoner doctor dad.
2. Secret societies: Legion of shadows and conspiracy among the commoners such as the cement truck people vs. Dickens’ Jacques peasants conspiracy that began the French revolution.
3. “Recalled to life” and inventing a new name from prison: the child, Bane, and Batman escaping from the prison and Catwoman wanting a new identity vs Dickens’ doctor and Darnay each separately escaping the Bastille.
4. Twin or mirror identities in which one dies for the other: Batman and Wayne faking deaths vs Darnay and that drunk guy switching places in the final scene.
5. Faithful, bachelor servant: Alfred vs. Lorry.
6. Incompetent, oblivious leaders or the leaders being lecherous scumbags: that rich guy Catwoman seduces and uses as her cover or the mayor at his football game vs. the monsigniere.
7. Using the rich’s own weapons against them: using Wayne’s armory against Gotham vs imprisoning the rich in the Bastille.
8. The courtroom mock trial scene.
9. Hero returning to save the commoners who cry out for his help: Batman becomes Batman again and somehow goes from the Asiatic prison to Gotham because he can’t stand the sufferings of his citizens on TV. Similarly, Darnay returns to Paris because his old servant writes him pleading for help against injustice.
10. Misunderstood nobleman hero: Wayne and Darnay, both donate their entire fortunes to the poor before the works even begin (Wayne turns out to have invested everything in his nuclear energy project and Darnay forsakes his entire estate and changes his name, hoping the commoners will appreciate taking over his lands).
11. Baleful, brutish servant who executes mastermind mistress’s bidding: Bane and Madame Defarge’s husband.

Both Nolan and Dickens are firmly in the top 1%. Like Nolan, Dickens was a wildly successful celebrity writer in his times, widely acknowledged as a genius. However, Dickens was born into poverty, so while A Tale of Two Cities is strongly critical of the chaos and popular uprising, he was passionately empathetic with the poor and also condemned their abuse and the decadence of the rich. The donation of Wayne Manor to orphan boys would probably be something Dickens would admire.

The chaos and violence against the rich is something criticized in both Dickens and The Dark Knight Rises- even Catwoman repents and decides that maybe it wasn’t what she wanted after all. A Tale of Two Cities struck me as being about karma and breaking the cycle of evil: Madame Defarge allows vengeance to consume her life so that she’s indifferent between good and evil. As long as you allow this to happen, you’re doomed no matter what your original victimization was because despite coming from a family victimized by the rich, Defarge is clearly the villain in Dickens’ book who ends up pitilessly killing many innocent people. In contrast to Madame Defarge, Darnay tries to break the cycle of careless decadence by forsaking his lands and title. After assuming a new name and occupation, he achieves happiness and love. Darnay’s twin/mirror, the drunk dude whose name I forget, also breaks his cycle of wastrel drunkenness by taking Darnay’s place at the guillotine, finally redeeming himself and gaining a tragic yet noble sort of dignity and heroism.

Like A Tale of Two Cities, The Dark Knight Rises has a lot of ideas about rebirth. The billionaire lady is stuck in the past and loses all likeability- I don’t understand her obsession with her weird quest to redeem her dad to the point that she commits a mass murder-suicide. Alfred is continuously bugging Wayne to finally break out from the past which he ends up successfully doing, which I guess is supposed to be a positive ending. Catwoman is also all about breaking from her past and also finally succeeds, which is supposed to be a victorious note in the movie.

Thematically Nolan and Dickens are both saying that even if stuff sucked a lot in the past (like Mom dying in prison and everyone getting the plague and having to climb out of the pit you were born in with a weird, deformed, masked dude as your only friend), you have to somehow get over it! Life is unfair and it sucks! But there can be heroes (ranging from vigilante billionaires/ French noblemen to petty thieves/ drunken lawyers ) who are self sacrificing enough to try to rescue the community from the injustice they’ve been suffering under for ages. And instead of chaotically turning against said heroes and vilifying them for sticking their necks out, the community should be noble and self sacrificing in turn, the way those policemen finally got out of their homes and senselessly/ admirably rushed into a mob of criminals shooting machine guns… And unlike how Madame Defarge convinced the French Revolutionaries to guillotine Darnay anyway despite first acquitting him- don’t do that.

Even if you got dumped by Maggie Gyllenhaal, or had your family murdered by rich men, or had your family and childhood crush murdered by criminal men, or were forced into a life of crime, or the woman you love will never love you back even though you explicitly told her you LOVED her (she can’t love you bc you’re Batman/ an alcoholic/ not as cool as some blue-eyed, blond politician), or you were wrongfully imprisoned in the Bastille or some horrible pit for 17 years, if you don’t get over it, change, and move on with life, you’ll become a joyless jerk who even the aged family servant finds unbearable and escapes from. Despite initially seeming cool, principled, and focused while you’re menacingly and impassively knitting the names of your enemies into shrouds, eventually everyone will decide you’re actually a relentless psycho that they’re scared to hang out with, chalking up the regrettable night they spent with you to meaningless rainy, dark, mansion sex and living happily ever after with the ex-thief turned do-gooder.

Sure, you killed a lot of people and destroyed a lot of wealth. But after everything your enemies are happy and you end up dead! (Spoiler: Madame Defarge gets shot by a maid. (Other spoiler: Gotham is actually Pittsburgh by the sea! Wow! Go Steelers!)) So even if you have a really good reason and suffered a lot unjustly due to people who don’t deserve the love or money they’re swimming in, don’t turn evil. Instead, be awesome and help others because there are always impoverished orphans who are way worse off. Orphans like Oliver Twist or Josh Gordan-Levitt remind you life is not all about you, and your suffering, and your revengenda. And if you do become really powerful one day, don’t act like those jerks who hurt you. Even though they suck and annoyingly always seem to avoid punishment, just let it go, work on using science or getting rich so you can solve the energy crisis (hopefully in a less obviously WMD way to the extent that Morgan Freeman put a timer on the thing), and enjoy life by falling in love, vacationing in Florence, becoming the celebrity author of David Copperfield whose works inspire blockbusters by celebrity writer-directors like Nolan, etc.

It’s a positive message saying everyone should have some compassion and that any individual can be a hero as long as there’s love. I think the message came out more naturally in A Tale of Two Cities than in The Dark Knight Rises, but it’s there in both.

12 Replies to “Batman vs. Charles Dickens”

  1. Many of the film’s decisions on plot, structure and character make more sense to me in light of this reading, which comes as something of a revelation…though the Nolan version still seem somewhat clunkily constructed to me. I’m not sure the story structure works for The Dark Knight Rises as well as it did for Dickens–rather, it seems a bit grafted on. Still, it’s interesting this is where he was coming from, and the messages seem to come together more clearly

  2. My host has been acting up so my comments were lost. I said something about how English people might've viewed this movie differently because A Tale of Two Cities is on the tip of everyone's tongue over there whereas it's not on our (America's) radar so maybe his whole parallel was super obvious to them whereas I was like "this is the stupidest thing I've ever seen, please get me out of this dumb cave" for 90% of the movie.

  3. So, it just occurred to me when re-reading this that a lot of the batman/Nolan examples you point out are related to the..um.. lore of batman comics, especially comics by frank miller. His batman: year one comic helped transform batman from campy comic to a darker hero with more grey morals and deeper background – wikipedia tells me he added grit and realism – at a key time in the comic to tv time period. Perhaps the medium of writing a good story, such as in batman and tale of two city leads, is why they are similar.

    Nolan's contribution to batman story was to combime Bane and Talia's past to make a 'surprising movie twist' that left batman comic fans disappointed. In comic form, Bane emerges from the pit and takes on batman himself as a smart and capabble villain, which is is refreshing after jokers comic attempts at batman because joker never truely wishes baman to die. Talia is Raz Agouls daughter ( I know I'm butcher his name… sorry) and she and Watyne/batman are together and have a son.I understand she comes to hate him latter. I think batman the lore/comic (many authors for many different stories and series) is similar to tale of two cities because both are well written stories that focus on being realistic and not shying away from the truth being harsh. Nolan's batman movie was terrific because he too used that super realism in the movie. How would a real man be both bruce wyne and batman emotionally, and how does that affect the people around him.

    Although Nolan had to (Not) make Bane and talia weaker character to give them an unnecessary matching background for a more dramatic finale. Dickens would never do that. What mmild batman fan was not thinking – noooo , it was bane who climbed out of the pit ! and "obviously he had a daughter not a son". Ok, I'll stop. Nancy I just wanted to give a comment and I love batman. … I looked for abritish connection to batman, and all I ffound out was that the graphic nobelist -amazing -Alan Moore is british yet he only directly wrote a story about joker…

    1. GM I didn’t know you loved Batman! I’ve never read the comics or seen many of the older movies. I watched the cartoon in my youth which I think was quite good. Batman is probably one of my favorite superheroes because he’s the most real and his villains are all psychos so really unpredictable but also somehow more sympathetic due to their psychological issues (is evil a form of psychosis?). Batman himself is also far from psychological normal, so maybe in his case the whole superhero meme is a special metaphor for battling one’s own inner demons. Do the Batman movies stick to the comics in general? I think it’s interesting to stray away if the writer has some kind of thematic vision they want to explore, which I think Nolan did best in Dark Knight Rises. His heavy handedness is somehow fine given the high drama of the situations. Nolan is very creative and writes and directs, and for me movies are really cool when the director is the writer. Is Joe Wright capable of writing? O I watched Hanna last night (I actually rented a DVD from a STORE) and was baffled. There was some stuff that was like several minutes in 1 shot but I don’t know if I really appreciate that kind of thing. Maybe I just didn’t like the script? I don’t know…

  4. So, it just occurred to me when re-reading this that a lot of the batman/Nolan examples you point out are related to the..um.. lore of batman comics, especially comics by frank miller. His batman: year one comic helped transform batman from campy comic to a darker hero with more grey morals and deeper background – wikipedia tells me he added grit and realism – at a key time in the comic to tv time period. Perhaps the medium of writing a good story, such as in batman and tale of two city leads, is why they are similar.

    Nolan's contribution to batman story was to combime Bane and Talia's past to make a 'surprising movie twist' that left batman comic fans disappointed. In comic form, Bane emerges from the pit and takes on batman himself as a smart and capabble villain, which is is refreshing after jokers comic attempts at batman because joker never truely wishes baman to die. Talia is Raz Agouls daughter ( I know I'm butcher his name… sorry) and she and Watyne/batman are together and have a son.I understand she comes to hate him latter. I think batman the lore/comic (many authors for many different stories and series) is similar to tale of two cities because both are well written stories that focus on being realistic and not shying away from the truth being harsh. Nolan's batman movie was terrific because he too used that super realism in the movie. How would a real man be both bruce wyne and batman emotionally, and how does that affect the people around him.

    Although Nolan had to (Not) make Bane and talia weaker character to give them an unnecessary matching background for a more dramatic finale. Dickens would never do that. What mmild batman fan was not thinking – noooo , it was bane who climbed out of the pit ! and "obviously he had a daughter not a son". Ok, I'll stop. Nancy I just wanted to give a comment and I love batman. … I looked for abritish connection to batman, and all I ffound out was that the graphic nobelist -amazing -Alan Moore is british yet he only directly wrote a story about joker…

  5. So, it just occurred to me when re-reading this that a lot of the batman/Nolan examples you point out are related to the..um.. lore of batman comics, especially comics by frank miller. His batman: year one comic helped transform batman from campy comic to a darker hero with more grey morals and deeper background – wikipedia tells me he added grit and realism – at a key time in the comic to tv time period. Perhaps the medium of writing a good story, such as in batman and tale of two city leads, is why they are similar.

    Nolan's contribution to batman story was to combime Bane and Talia's past to make a 'surprising movie twist' that left batman comic fans disappointed. In comic form, Bane emerges from the pit and takes on batman himself as a smart and capabble villain, which is is refreshing after jokers comic attempts at batman because joker never truely wishes baman to die. Talia is Raz Agouls daughter ( I know I'm butcher his name… sorry) and she and Watyne/batman are together and have a son.I understand she comes to hate him latter. I think batman the lore/comic (many authors for many different stories and series) is similar to tale of two cities because both are well written stories that focus on being realistic and not shying away from the truth being harsh. Nolan's batman movie was terrific because he too used that super realism in the movie. How would a real man be both bruce wyne and batman emotionally, and how does that affect the people around him.

    Although Nolan had to (Not) make Bane and talia weaker character to give them an unnecessary matching background for a more dramatic finale. Dickens would never do that. What mmild batman fan was not thinking – noooo , it was bane who climbed out of the pit ! and "obviously he had a daughter not a son". Ok, I'll stop. Nancy I just wanted to give a comment and I love batman. … I looked for abritish connection to batman, and all I ffound out was that the graphic nobelist -amazing -Alan Moore is british yet he only directly wrote a story about joker…

  6. I finally watched this film so I can finally read this post without worrying about spoilers. I was thinking a bit about what lessons I should take away from the movie, but I guess I can just take yours from this post! Thanks! Sometimes you need to move on, and be compassionate, even if things suck(ed) and are unfair. Also, tell the truth.

    1. Okay, I added that last one about telling the truth, but I just realized that this film _also_ ends with a lie to the public about a fallen hero…

      1. Parts of the movie are still confusing, probably still bc I don’t get some actually-not-at-all-obscure reference Nolan is making- that seems more likely than a genius such as Nolan making careless decisions or errors re: narrative. Like is a lesson that I’m not supposed to tie a rope around my body when I’m trying to jump over something? Bc you’re supposed to not be scared and Batman’s main problem was… fear? I thought he already kind of knew how to deal w fear. Identity and happiness, sure- he’s got to work on that stuff, but fear? Or maybe don’t tie the rope bc it weighs too much? That’s a weird lesson to learn that has nothing to do with anything… Or don’t follow the crowd and assume this rope is long enough? But why would Batman the billionaire vigilante have to learn not to follow the crowd? Why did we go through all that??? Until I understand, I’m definitely tying all kinds of stuff around myself next time I’m in a pit.

        1. I was also a bit confused how to interpret Batman’s time in the pit; I assume a transformation occurred as part of his “moving on” process that ultimately allows him to succeed, but what specifically changed? My current guess is that prior to the pit, Batman was depressed and lacking in motivation. He continued to act in the role of Batman, but only because he felt he needed to and he didn’t see any other possible role for himself. He didn’t fear death, but in a bad way; He didn’t fear death in that he was okay with dying. In the pit, he rediscovers a reason for living and acting, which is that he really does care for Gotham and is driven by the goal of saving it. He reattains his fear of death (because of what it would mean for Gotham if he died), which is a good thing. While you should be willing to accept death if it’s the best course of action, you should still fear it, and (the fellow prisoner claims) that fear is the single greatest driving factor that will allow us to accomplish things we could never do otherwise. So not tying the rope illustrates that he has regained his fear of death and is able to use it to succeed where he would otherwise fail. That was my interpretation, anyway.

          But I would still tie a rope around myself the next time I’m in a pit. =P

          1. I like your analysis! He also did seem depressed with that French chick pump-and-dumping him but then after the pit he got to marry Anne Hathaway. I found it so sad and un-manly (yet strangely superherolike (poor superheroes can never get the girl. We can never fall in love…)) he was longing for that dead woman all that time oblivious to the fact she didn’t even like him despite her fiancee dying. Even w his billionaire status, he couldn’t get the girl, which must be painful to deal with (and why I keep my trophy boyfriend decked out in jewels).

Leave a Reply